Sunday,
June 25, 2006
Vol. III No. 13 |
Welcome
to the
Over the
Airwaves
aviation journal. This complimentary bi-weekly e-mailing
is being sent to pilots and aviation enthusiasts around the
world. Its aim
is to promote
flight safety, encourage students and new pilots, and to build
enthusiasm for aviation in general.
Dear Pilots and Aviation Enthusiasts:
Remember the last time you held a live snake in your hand? You likely grabbed the snake just behind its head while the remainder of the snake wiggled around your arm. What could holding a live snake possibly have to do with aviation? Think about it. When you held the snake, did you have a ready plan "B" if the snake began to reach around and bite your arm? I bet you did! Sure! You would let loose of the snake and quickly pull your hand aggressively away. Whether or not that was the correct thing to do depends upon if the snake bit you! Snakes and airplanes!
A sudden engine fire on start-up; a broken throttle linkage and runaway engine on taxi; a thrown piston rod or broken crankshaft on takeoff; a failed vacuum pump; a blocked Pitot tube; an out-of-control autopilot; a bird strike that smashes the windshield in flight; an inadvertent thunderstorm penetration; a blown tire on landing; extreme turbulence, severe icing, or thunderstorm penetration; mid-air collision; gear failure on landing; deer strike on roll-out; a runway overrun. There are hundreds of ways that airplanes can bite us. Yes . . . airplanes are like snakes. Ninety nine percent of the time, they are harmless. It is the remaining one percent that catch us by surprise. It is the "surprise" part of flying where the crew and passenger lives are held in the balance. What about those one percent events? Anybody with more than a couple hundred hours of PIC time can appreciate those one percent events. Each one they survived made them a better pilot. Sadly, some did not survive their particular one percent event. We pilots would do well to continually focus upon the one percent stuff that happens. I think about this every time I cross Lake Michigan, fly to the Bahamas, or takeoff over water at night from the Toronto Island Airport. That's why I always carry a readily accessible life raft. I also keep a close eye on boats as I cross. I think a lot about icing in the winter and thunderstorms in the summer. For me, known ice aircraft certification, stormscope and radar, and turbocharger are comforting friends. There are plenty of other plan "B" options as well.
And I always carry survival gear. A handheld radio and back up GPS are also welcomed peace-of-mind items. Always knowing our location by lat/long coordinates down to the second is a big time saver for rescue personnel! Taking off into a 200' ceiling? Do you have your moving map GPS scaled back to one to three miles . . . so you can find a four lane highway in a hurry should your engine fail shortly after liftoff? Having the instrument approach for my departure airport dialed into my radios or GPS for an immediate return to the airport is a great plan "B" as well. Having a plan "B" in mind anytime that plan "A" is not working out can spell the difference between inconvenience and unsurvivable. It provides that golden minute of opportunity that can save the day when the snake strikes. Sadly, there is not a plan "B" for every possible scenario. There are those few seconds in every flight where we are hung out on a proverbial limb. But that's the risk we take as pilots. Our job, however, should be to minimize these moments of absolute vulnerability by constantly asking, "Do I have a plan "B"? The 80% factor! Let's never forget the fact that nearly 80 percent of all fatal accidents are officially attributed to pilot error. Translated, this means that the lack of proper pilot input is responsible for nearly 80 percent of all fatal accidents. In many such cases, the pilot simply did not have a carefully worked out plan "B". Imagine if every GA pilot had a plan "B" worked out for each phase of flight and for every possible flight contingency. Curiously, we do not see too much of this kind of contingency planning in the private, instrument, or commercial pilot training syllabus. This is added reason why we should all spend more time in aggressive plan "B" thinking!
You are flying in IFR conditions, scanning a full panel of properly operating instruments. Suddenly one instrument after another begins to fail. What would be the minimum complement of instruments you would require?
Answer:
Our first objective would be to maintain a wings level attitude. If the compass is not turning, the airplane is not banking. If we wish to turn from a known heading to another
known heading, we simply bank at an angle that allows
the compass to turn at 3 degrees per second. Do
the
Our second objective is to maintain altitude. We can do this by comparing what our tachometer is telling us with what our airspeed indicator is displaying. At a known power setting, the airspeed indicator will tell us if we are going up or down. For example, at full power in a Cessna 172 or Piper Warrior, 60KIAS would indicate that we are climbing. Similarly, 130KIAS would indicate a descent.
Increase power to 2500RMP and pitch to 90KIAS, the airplane will climb at roughly 500 feet per minute (depending up altitude, temperature, and A/C weight). Reduce power to 1900RPM, and pitch to 90KIAS, the airplane will descend at roughly 500 feet per minute. Calculate the number of minutes you need to fly at this descent rate. By referencing your clock or wristwatch you will arrive closely to your desired descent altitude) The same power setting principles work in airplanes with constant speed propellers. Simply substitute manifold pressure settings for RPM. See the reasoning here? If we understand the relationship between indicated airspeed and power settings in the airplanes we fly, we do not need an altimeter or vertical speed indicator (VSI) to save the day. In fact, we can strip the panel nearly bare of instruments and we can still survive in the clouds! Many of these basic airmanship skills are being lost in today's glass cockpit setups. We are beginning to lose awareness of the relationship between power, pitch, and airspeed with notable adverse consequence. Dials are being replaced by scrolling airspeed tapes and engine speed is being displayed digitally. This makes it doubly important that we are able to compute which power setting and airspeed indications produce level, climbing, and descending pitch attitudes. Glass cockpit drivers . . . don't allow yourself to become aeronautically dumb!
The best way to master this is to cover all instruments. Get a safety pilot, put on a hood, and climb up into VFR conditions and practice this until you are satisfied that you can fly safely with a radically reduced panel. Instruments fail, often at the worst time. Making do with whatever information we have, even if it means a bit of in-flight calculation, could turn a potential tragedy into a memorable flight.
How many times have you grown weary after four or more hours in the cockpit only to face a challenging approach procedure and difficult landing scenario? It always seems to work that way. More is expected of us when we are tired than when the day is new and we are fresh! Learning to pace ourselves . . . Frequent OTA readers know that I
have little regard for any form of simulated
training in anything short of a full-up airline type
simulator. A 1.5 hour work out
Everything is working against us on long cross-country flights. The weather is changing, fuel management is always an issue, we have to (pardon me) pee, and we're just plain tired. Not only are we physiologically exhausted, the gap between our piloting task requirements and our pilot capabilities narrows dramatically as we transition from cruise to the approach and landing phase of flight. Learning to pace ourselves for long cross country takes lots of practice. Some things to keep in mind are shown in the table below:
The last segment could be the deal killer! Do whatever it takes to prepare yourself for the last flight segment. Get set up early for the approach. Have everything you need close at hand and properly arranged, e.g., approach plates, FBO selected with frequency, flashlight, etc. Leave nothing to chance!
You are looking at one very excited family! My good friend, Mark Weissman of Grand Island, NY, with his wife, Lynn and twin children Brandon and Brianna, is receiving the keys to his new (new to him) 1989 A-36 Beech Bonanza. Mark is stepping up to the Bo from a Piper Archer that he sold about 8 years ago. For him, the challenge is not only to regain his pilot currency, but to also become proficient with this high performance, six place aircraft. New fun . . . added responsibilities! Mark is a physician (Ob-Gyn). Does that tell you something? You bet! Doctors are inherently self-confident, high achieving individuals. Doctors also have nasty reputations for bringing their self-confidence into the cockpit where this trait brings no special piloting skills. An over abundance of self-confidence is, in fact, the greatest enemy of safe flight. Mark is keenly aware of this fact. He is an inherently good pilot, and he has secured the best recurrent training possible. Others in this category, however, may not be as prepared. The A-36 Bonanza, like any high performance single or twin, is not a basic, two or four place trainer. It is designed to go fast and carry more weight. Its safe operating envelope is narrower and its design margins for error are smaller. Its systems are more complex and there are more of them. Becoming proficient in high performance airplanes is only one small part of the process. Maintaining one's proficiency is another story altogether. 10 to 12 hours per month! Despite Mark's enormously busy medical practice and the time demands it places on him, he and Lynn are both well aware of the fact that he must fly a minimum of 10 to 12 hours a month to realistically maintain his proficiency in the Bonanza. Adding instrument proficiency to the mix requires even more time in the air each month! It's easy to log 10 to 12 hours a month if you take weekend trips. If you don't, then commit yourself to a regular two hour in-flight workout at least once a week. And if you cannot accomplish this, then maintain a relationship with a skilled CFI who can provide challenging workouts at least once monthly. High performance airplanes are fun . . . but they require an added recurrent training requirement. Mark will do well with his Bonanza because he understands the risks and trains hard to mitigate those risks. We need to follow his example!
How clouds are formed Three ingredients are necessary for clouds to form. One is adequate water vapor. The second is condensation nuclei. The third is a method by which the air can be cooled.
When the air cools and reaches its saturation point, the
invisible water vapor changes into a visible state.
Through the processes of sublimation and condensation, moisture
condenses on particles of matter such as dust, Cloud Types
Cloud type is determined by its height, shape, and behavior. They are classified according to the height of their bases as low, middle, or high clouds, as well as clouds with vertical development.
Towering cumulus clouds indicate areas of instability in the
atmosphere, and the air around and inside them is turbulent.
These types of clouds often develop into
Cumulonimbus clouds contain large amounts of moisture and unstable air, and usually produce hazardous weather phenomena such as lightning, hail, tornadoes, gusty winds, and wind shear. These extensive vertical clouds can be obscured by other cloud formations and are not always visible from the ground or while in flight. When this happens, these clouds are said to be embedded, hence the term, embedded thunderstorms. Proficient weather pilots read clouds like they read the newspaper. Each form or type of cloud is predictive of the ride ahead. Most clouds are safe to pass through. Others are sleeping bears capable of dismembering even the largest aircraft. Be sure you know the difference!
The engine started and idled for a couple of seconds. After that, either the student or the CFI advanced the throttle on this still cold engine to high RPM and began what appeared to be a mag check. Do you see anything wrong with this picture?
Then there was the racing of a cold engine. I wondered if the flight school owner knew the damage his CFI was doing to his aircraft. Many of the bad and oftentimes risky habits we observe in GA pilots were planted by inexperienced CFIs demonstrating bad practices. "Primacy of learning," which suggests that those items learned first make lasting impression, is the underlying culprit. Those first few actions of the CFI often carry through the entire flying life of his or her students. Worse, some of those badly infected students go on to become bad CFIs who perpetuate the problem. You can fix the problem by speaking up!
You know, he was right. He pointed out a bothersome oversight in my own flight training example. From that point on, I always instruct my students to taxi away from the fuel pumps immediately after fueling. The CFI sets a powerful example. What he or she does, flight students do as well. If you see a bad practice being exhibited by a CFI, speak up!
"Well . . . it's too windy up there. We'll get tossed around too much," comes their hapless reply. The effect of upper level winds
There is nothing inherent in high winds aloft that threaten even the lightest, least powerful airplane! The illustration to the right shows how ground speed is influenced by winds aloft. Note that the illustrated airplane continues to travel through the air at 120 knots regardless of the air flow speed around it. When does wind become a factor? Wind becomes a factor to aircraft in flight when: 1. Taking off and Landing: The direction of the wind relative to the runway has a significant effect on airplanes in flight.
2. Heading to Fly: If there were no winds aloft, we
could simply point the airplane
3. Fuel Considerations: Anybody who has faced a 60 knot headwind understands the effect of winds aloft on time to destination. And time aloft translates to the amount of fuel required to make a given trip. 4. Emergency Glide Distance: Have you ever crossed a wide body of open water without considering the winds? Of course not. You know precisely which direction to fly should the engine quit, right? Wind awareness at any stage of flight, whether taxiing or cruising aloft, is a sure sign of pilot proficiency. He or she knows precisely what the winds are doing to the airplane at any point in time. A proficient pilot understands winds, why they happen, and where they are coming from! He or she also knows, however, that apart from turbulence or thunderstorms, winds aloft have little bearing on the safety of flight.
Tracy was a pretty lady with a ready smile and a happy greeting for everybody she saw. Well known for her expert tail wheel instruction, Tracy, daughter of airport owner Bob Dart, will be deeply missed. A memorial service at Dart Field will be scheduled in the coming weeks. A special OTA announcement regarding this service will made as soon as details become available.
One has to wonder what was going through the minds of the FAA when it formulated the Practical Test Standards (PTS) to qualify for an instrument rating. No night IFR training is specified in the PTS!
Yet there is no requirement in the instrument PTS for night IFR training. Flight schools and independent CFIs are free to sign off instrument students with no night training at all. And we all know that nearly all instrument check rides are given during daylight hours. So how do we know that we are proficient at night IFR flight? Trial and error? Night illusions are everywhere! AUTOKINESIS: This is caused by staring at a single point of light against a dark background for more than a few seconds. After a few moments, the light appears to move on its own. FALSE HORIZON: A false horizon can occur when the natural horizon is obscured or not readily apparent. It can be generated by confusing bright stars and city lights. It can also occur while flying toward the shore of an ocean or a large lake. Because of the relative darkness of the water, the lights along the shoreline can be mistaken for stars in the sky (see illustration above).
NIGHT
LANDING ILLUSIONS:
Landing illusions occur in many forms. Above featureless
terrain at night, there is a natural tendency to fly a
lower-than-normal approach. Elements that cause any type
of visual obscuration, such as rain, haze, or a dark runway
environment also can cause low approaches.
[Photo right
is of Ames, Iowa at night from 15,000'.] Pilots have even mistaken the lights on moving trains as runway or approach lights. Bright runway or approach lighting systems can create the illusion that the airplane is closer to the runway, especially where few lights illuminate the surrounding terrain. Weather avoidance at night is problematic By definition, IFR flight involves complications. When these complications occur at night, the "see and avoid" rules no longer apply. Thunderstorms on moonless nights cannot be seen, therefore without ATC assistance they cannot be avoided. Turbulent build-ups hidden by the dark of night can startle the instrument pilot to the point of causing disorientation and loss of aircraft control. Become IFR night proficient . . . The differences between day/night VFR flight versus day/night IFR flight are profound. Dim cockpit lighting makes charts and plates difficult to read, weather is more difficult to avoid, and the ever-present night illusions make night IFR flight a bigger challenge than most pilots believe. Like all such challenges, they are best addressed head by aggressive initial and recurrent training. Contact your favorite CFII and go out and fly IFR at night until you become absolutely proficient!
Weight and balance is the one thing many GA pilots take
for granted. We believe that if we can fit it in
the airplane, we can fly. This particularly true with
Every student pilot eventually learns the principles of weight and balance before he or she takes the checkride. After the cherished certificate is received, W&B take a literal backseat in the minds of most pilots. Vowing never to take off over-gross, a situation comes along where the limits of the loading envelope get pushed out a bit. The hapless pilot instantly becomes a test pilot and, whether he knows it or not, his insurance company may be off the hook for any resultant damages. (Remember, aircraft insurance operates differently than automobile insurance. To remain covered, we pilots are restricted to operating our a/c within prescribed limits of performance!) Be Prepared - Always compute a weight and balance Anybody with a Palm Pilot, iPac, or similar handheld computing device can quickly and easily compute a weight and balance on the fly. Simply create a mini-Excel spreadsheet. Then plug in the variable numbers, press "compute" and you instantly have your total weight and moment! Remember WAM! [Weight x Arm = Moment]
With the total weight and moment, refer to the loading graph. Plot the weight on the vertical (Y) axis and the moment on the horizontal (X) axis and, bingo, you're good to go. If your computed plot takes outside of the envelope, don't fly. Instead, adjust your load (fuel/passengers/baggage) accordingly.
A word about overweight flight! There is no question that, given enough runway, an airplane loaded 20 to 30 percent, or even 50 percent overweight will fly, leastwise in ground effect. It may actually climb to cruise altitude. But what are the risks of overweight operation? The first risk is . . . . will it climb out of ground effect? What will happen once the overweight airplane reaches the end of the runway. Will it climb out of ground effect and clear any obstacles? The second and more insidious risk is the effect of excess
weight on the structural integrity of the airplane.
We know, for example, that the G loading on an airplane equals 1
in level, unaccelerated flight. This means a fully loaded 2,500 pound
airplane weights 2,500 pounds in level flight. The problem of excess weight occurs when we add G forces to the airplane. We know, for example, that the G forces doubles when in a 60 degree bank. In this flight attitude, our 2,500 pound airplane now weights 5,000 pounds. Roll over into a 70 degree bank and the airplane suddenly weighs 7,500 pounds. Aircraft designers, of course, are well aware of the load forces placed on an airplane. They design the structural strength accordingly. What about the overweight aircraft? Let's take our 2,500 pound gross weight airplane and overload it by 200 pounds. In a 70 degree bank, those 200 pounds now weight 600 pounds. This added load could be enough to cause structural damage and possibly an airframe component failure in flight. Reference to the VG diagram below illustrates how G loading is affected by airspeed. Note that aircraft certified in the normal category at maximum gross weight must be able to withstand a positive 3.8gs and a negative 1.52gs. Adding even one pound of excess weight takes the airplane out of its certification range!
While and overweight airplane is problematic for the reasons noted above, equally serious consequences can occur if the center of gravity (CG) is outside the published loading envelope . . . even if the total weight is within prescribed limits.
All things considered, operating an airplane outside of its W&B limits not only bad practice, it is also illegal. Remember, you are fair game for an FAA inspector to walk up and request a copy of your weight and balance computations. You better be prepared!
That's just what Liz King of East Aurora, NY did this past winter. Standing with me last week on the day she received her private pilot certificate, she is one very proud lady. She should be. Liz, like so many other flight students, suffered through several flight instructors before she found one who would stick it out with her. Credit EAA Chapter 46 Much of the credit for Liz's flying success comes from her many friends in Buffalo's EAA Chapter 46. She received lots of support and encouragement (and advice) at each meeting and social event.
Meet us at Oshkosh! The EAA 46 Oshkosh compound will be up and operational this year as usual. As many as 60 chapter members and friends will pitch tents and park campers around the giant green and white circus tent in the Scholler campgrounds located near the Theater in the Woods. Family style breakfasts and dinners are expertly prepared and served each day of the event. This year will feature a full-fledged pig roast. Please be sure to stop in and say hello! For more about EAA Chapter 46's many activities, click HERE. By the way, EAA 46's website was designed by Liz King's husband, Bill. Need help in website design, contact Bill at williamking@adelphia.net. Photo credits Jim Cavanaugh.
Air traffic controllers do not make mistakes very often, but when they do . . . watch out!
We called Cleveland Center and requested the ILS Runway 32 approach. The controller descended us to 4,000 feet and issued the first vector enroute to the final approach course. I used this time to implore my student to ALWAYS be aware of his position relative to the plan view on the instrument approach plate. The timing of this lesson could not have been better! We were about six miles from making our final turn to the inbound course when the controller called us and said, "Nxxxx, I have lost radar contact with you. Squawk VFR and fly the approach visually." Huh . . . . I looked at my student and said "She can't do that. We're on an IFR flight plan!" I queried the controller. "Ah, Cleveland Center, we'll fly the approach as published. Request direct to the Bradford VOR." "I said I have lost radar contact with you. I cannot clear you for the approach. Squawk VFR and fly it visually," she retorted. Rather than debate the issue with the controller on the radio, I simply complied with her instructions and asked for her telephone number. Upon landing, I telephoned Cleveland Center and discussed the incident with the supervisor. He quickly acknowledged the fact that ATC cannot cancel a pilot's instrument flight plan (except upon landing at a tower controlled airport). He further affirmed that the controller's actions were incorrect and apologized for any inconvenience caused by this incident. Okay, we'll chalk this one up to a rookie controller making a mistake. All of us do this from time to time. The important point for us pilots to remember is to ALWAYS be aware of our position.
In the incident described above, had we been in IFR conditions without knowing our position, the outcome might have been tragic. The controller would have likely been de-certified and things could have gone a lot worse for us!
For OTA readers in the northern hemisphere, we are entering the hottest weeks of the summer. Correcting pressure altitude (weight of the atmosphere) for non-standard temperature can exact a very big performance price from your airplane.
Remember the steps in determining density altitude 1. Determine the pressure altitude for your airport by dialing 29.92 in the Kollsman window in your altimeter and read the displayed altitude. 2. Locate the pressure altitude diagonal line on the chart to the left. 3. Slide up or down this line to a point atop the outside temperature shown on the horizontal (X) axis on the bottom. 4. Read the corresponding density altitude on the vertical (Y) axis. In summary, as the temperature climbs, so does density altitude. This will have a direct effect on ground roll distance and climb rate. Be sure to check your aircraft's performance tables in your POH before operating on a hot day!
The training exercise that led to the death of both the instructor and the pilot/owner of a Beech A-36 Bonanza was a simulated engine failure after takeoff and an emergency return to the airport.
Airplanes do not stall/spin by themselves! Given enough altitude, there is nothing inherently hazardous about initiating a 180 degree turn back to the airport in the event of engine failure on takeoff. But two immutable conditions must be met. The first condition is, the airplane's pitch attitude must be kept below the critical angle of attack to preclude a stall. Remember, stall speed increases with bank angle. The other requirement is to insure that the turn back to the airport is coordinated, e.g., centered ball in the slip/skid indicator. Each of these requirements are easily achievable. The stall is prevented by keeping close attention to the airspeed indicator (which is always primary for climb). The bottom of the green arch on the airspeed indicator displays the stall speed. Again, remember that stall speed increases dramatically with bank angle. Similarly, the spin is prevented by keeping a close eye on the slip/skid indicator. While an airplane can be made to stall at any airspeed, operating anywhere near the bottom of the green arch on the airspeed indicator places the airplane at substantial stall risk. Simply put, don't go there. Instead, lower the nose to instantly increase airspeed which, of course, reduces the angle of attack below the critical angle. Stall Speed Increases with Bank Angle (load factor)! The chart below illustrates the relationship between load factor and stall speed. The yellow line shows by example that a 3G turn (70 degree bank angle) in this particular airplane increases the stall speed from 45 knots to 70 knots!
Assuming the accident pilot entered a steep bank angle on his return to the airport, it is easy to see how a stall could have resulted. Adding any element of a yaw (non-centered ball in the slip/skid indicator) in this turn would have likely precipitated the spin! There is only ONE safe way to practice the 180 degree power off return to the airport. That way is to perform the maneuver at least 3,000' AGL. This insures adequate altitude should the maneuver not work out as planned. Simply use your altimeter to assess altitude loss in the turn. Caution about emergency training The accident record reveals far too many fatal accidents resulting from aggressive flight instructors attempting to inject too much realism in their emergency training exercises. Realistic emergency training is important, but two conditions must first be met:
Truth in advertising has become part of
the fabric of nearly every industry from medicine, to
merchandising, to banking, and to airline travel.
Consumers are
Then we have general aviation . . . an
industry that seems to operate under a different set of
consumer rules. Here, consumers are aggressively
recruited, seduced by promises of fast training, speed, and
a fool-proof guarantees of safety. Every
component of general aviation, from aircraft manufacturers
to flight schools paint a yellow brick road to the Wizard of
Aviation Happiness!
Public not buying it!
Not surprisingly, the public is not buying it.
While the spin-meisters of general aviation would like us
all to believe that the industry is booming, it isn't.
New pilot starts are down 58 percent from their peak in
1979. Even the total number of licensed pilots
is down 25 percent during the same period despite a 35 percent
increase in the total population. Curiously, a continuation of this negative pilot trend will result in a very serious shortage of commercial and airline pilots in the coming years!
Maybe it is time
that general aviation follow the lead of other industries
and freely admit its own associated risks. In so
doing, the consumer view of general aviation might shift
from suspicion and fear to open awareness and a commitment
to mitigate risks through aggressive initial and recurrent
training.
Let's begin telling it like it is!
Remember, statistical information can be spun in any
direction the writer chooses. Substituting accident
numbers for accident rates can be extremely misleading! Let's
begin telling consumers that much of the general aviation flight
training system is in disarray with rank beginners serving
as flight instructors and a recurrent training virtually
non-existent for a vast majority of our pilots.
Wow . . . . nobody would fly if that was
the message we send out to the public!
Not so. When consumers know and understand the
risks of any endeavor, whether it be flying, skiing,
playing football, parachute jumping, or scuba
diving, they respond appropriately by
taking adequate safeguards. But they first must know
the risks! Light Sport . . . hmmm!
Imagine, a
person can walk in off the street and be licensed to fly
himself and an unsuspecting passenger with a mere 20 hours
of instruction. And no medical examination is
necessary!
Any aviator who believes in the 20 hour
minimum training rule has spent too much time at
high altitude with a pinched oxygen tube!
In truth, the light sport program IS safe
when pursued by proficient pilots with adequate primary and
recurrent training. Anything short of that (and 20
hours of instruction is far short of that) is downright
dangerous.
Not so, says the EAA and AOPA, strong
advocates of the light sport program. And that's what
they convinced the FAA. Let's wait and see . . .
Stall/spin training, alone, requires at least five or six
hours to complete. Add emergency procedures,
rudimentary navigation, ATC procedures and communications,
weather factors, and basic maneuvering skills and you have a
solid 40 hour in-flight curriculum!
Remember, from a safety
perspective, there are very few things that a private pilot
can do that a light sport pilot cannot do!
Let the truth be told!
Somewhere in this new program consumers
need to be told the truth about the inherent risks of
flight. Then, when they know the risks, they can
scoff at the 20 hour training bit and go out and find
competent instruction. The same holds true for all
levels of general aviation.
We pilots, too, need to be frequently reminded of
the inherent risks of any incapacity, oversight, or neglect
in our operation of airplanes. Complacency is the arch
enemy of any pilot, young or old. A quick flight with
a missed preflight can stop us in our tracks . . . . for
eternity. When the risks of flight are upper most in
our mind whenever climbing into the cockpit, the likelihood
of an accident are dramatically reduced.
A call to action . . .
But we can change
all of that. Flight schools and independent flight
instructors, we should lay it on the line to our prospective
and current students. Let them know that speed kills.
When combined with altitude, the risks of nonproficient
flight are enormous. On the other hand, secure optimal
instruction and engage in annual recurrent training, the
risks can be substantially reduced. Big GA
organizations with wide audiences have done great things for
general aviation. Regrettably, however, some are
actually impeding our progress by telling the
FAA that added initial qualification and recurrent training
requirements represent an undo burden on pilots. Sure, we need to pay attention to what
is, in fact, relevant training. But let's not be
contrary to valid efforts to improve safety.
Sure, many of us are able to police our own training and
proficiency requirements. We do not need the FAA to
mandate what we already know and do. Unfortunately,
we're in a solid minority among GA pilots. The vast
majority of private pilot certificate holders are . . . .
well, let's just say in need of a tune up!
The next time some
spokesman for general aviation stands before you at a pilot
safety meeting and proclaims that everything is hunky dory
safety-wise in general aviation, challenge his or her facts. Let your
membership dues speak for you! When
enough of us do this, general aviation safety will improve
and our industry will begin to thrive.
Warbirds, Vintage, Homebuilts on Display Eggs,
pancakes, toast, coffee, tea Adults:
$5.00
This is the world's greatest aviation
celebration!
One solid week of total
immersion. Airplanes, air shows, product
displays, celebrity aviators, forums, aircraft
camping, food and fun.
Throw a tent, air mattress, and sleeping bag in the
back of your airplane, or hitch a ride with a flying
buddy.
Arrival and landing at Oshkosh is a "walk in the
park." Fun-filled controllers will hold your
hand as you make your way to the runway!
I'll be camping with Buffalo's EAA Chapter 46 in the
Scholler campground located near the Theater in the
Woods. Please stop by and say hello any
evening around 6pm. For more information
on AirVenture 2000, click
HERE.
Click HERE to view what other readers have had to say about "Over the Airwaves."
Over the Airwaves
is not intended to be your typical training,
official news, or club-type social journal.
Instead, its intent is to stimulate thought,
enhance aviation critical thinking skills, to
encourage the strong pilot, and to disturb the
weaker pilot. With this breadth of scope,
Over the Airwaves will evoke a number of
reactions. Please feel free to share these
reactions with me by clicking
HERE.
Past Issues of Click
HERE
to open any previous issue(s) of Over
the Airwaves and to search for any past articles.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ` | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ` |