January, 2008 Vol. V, No.
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welcome
to the
Over the
Airwaves
aviation journal. This complimentary e-publication
is prepared monthly for pilots and aviation enthusiasts around the
world. Its aim
is to promote
flight safety, encourage students and new pilots, and to build
enthusiasm for aviation in general.
Bob's Top 10 List for 2008 This is that time of year where we resolve to change our life. It's also a time when we recognize that another year has past and that we have one less to live. For many of us pilots, this is a scary thought! The year 2007 filled us all with doom and gloom about general aviation. Scandalous fuel prices, user fees, and ever-increasing regulation. Our local media captured expanding market shares by hyping our daily fatal wrecks and exploiting our many stupid pilot tricks. So, let's all do something specific in 2008 to turn things around. To this end, I put together Bob's Top Ten List of things each of us can do aviation-wise in the coming year. Items on this list appear in no particular order of importance or significance. I'll leave that up to you. The important thing is that we consider each item and do something about it. Here's the list . . .
Unlike owning guns or speaking freely, the privilege to fly is not addressed in our Bill of Rights. It is a freedom that can easily be taken from us by our all-knowing, wisdom-filled law makers in Washington, DC. Our best defense is a strong, thriving, and safe GA industry. Specifically targeting each item on the above list is an excellent way to make 2008 a wonderful year for general aviation. Happy New Year!
Airframe Icing . . . Very Serious Business!
First, lift . . . A quick reference to the graph below illustrates the relationship between angle-of-attack and lift. The red line shows that a wing carrying ice will stall at less than one-half the angle-of-attack that an ice-free wing will stall. This is because of adverse affect of wing icing on lift.
Once we start slowing and turning for the approach to landing, however, we could be in for a giant surprise! As we slow and begin our turn, our angle-of-attack increases. Reference to the accompanying chart illustrates that a wing carrying ice stalls at a much lower angle-of-attack than a "clean" wing. Since stall speed naturally increases in a bank, we could be in for the surprise of our life when slowing and turning onto the final approach course while carrying ice! Second, drag . . .
As illustrated in the adjacent chart (right), induced drag increases dramatically when there is ice on the wing. In real flight, as we slow the airplane for landing, the resultant increased angle-of-attack to maintain altitude produces a very steep increase in the coefficient of drag. This, in turn, requires an even greater angle-of-attack to maintain lift. This "multiplier effect" of increasing drag brought about by increasing angle-of-attack can produce a sudden, unexpected stall. If this occurs in uncoordinated flight, a spin is likely to result! Stall/spin Awareness Deficiency
Regardless of how we interpret the rules governing flight into weather conducive to icing, we will, at some time in our flying careers, come face-to-face with airframe icing. We can, of course, follow the advice of our well-intended but naive' CFIIs and flight schools and plan to avoid icing conditions at all costs. To do this, we can give up the notion of filing an IFR flight plan north of the Mason-Dixon Line any time from November 1st through April 30th! If we can live with that restriction, then icing is not likely to ever be a problem for us. Special icing alert for glass composite drivers!!
The bad news, however, can be very bad. We do not yet have a lot of experience operating these glass composite aircraft in icing conditions. Tragically, there have already been a number of fatal accidents in these aircraft when icing was a factor. Given the high performance capability of these aircraft, operating in or near icing conditions, even with anti-icing equipment such as TKS, is an unnecessary risk that proficient pilots should avoid. For more information on the legality of flying in icing conditions, click HERE. Ice is Not Nice!
Click HERE to view this video! [Thanks to OTA reader, Mark Croce of Buffalo, NY for sharing this with us.] Can it be VFR and IFR at the same time?
The FSS specialist assured Henry that the weather was VFR, so he boarded his wife and two young children into his rented Piper Warrior for the trip back home from Grandma's house in the country. Henry taxied onto the narrow runway. The only thing he could see out the window were the twinkling runway edge lights. Within seconds, those lights were only a blur as Henry and his family climbed up into the dark skies above. Suddenly, all outside references were gone. The featureless ground quickly turned into an amorphous blob of black nothingness. There were no moon or stars above to indicate up from down. Henry just entered the real world of IMC flight.
Henry was now alone at the controls for the very first time in a frighteningly strange environment. Henry didn't realize at the time that he and his wife and two young children had less than 45 seconds to live. That's the average life expectancy for a VFR-only pilot in IFR conditions. Yes, Henry, VFR and IFR conditions can co-exist!
His minimally required three hours of night flight, including his required night cross-country flight, never went beyond the vast urban sprawl surrounding his home airport. The lights on the ground always provided Henry with instant spatial awareness. He was right at home both day and night! Henry enjoyed flying at night. But he had never lost sight of the lights on the ground. Had Henry's night training taken him from his home airport to
those rural areas where street and house lights no longer dotted the terrain, he
would
Solution . . . VFR-only pilots flying at night must be prepared to deal with a sudden loss of horizon over featureless, rural terrain caused by the absence of ground lights below and star or moonlight above. This requires basic instrument flying skills that should have been acquired during their primary training. If these skills are missing, find a qualified CFII and develop them or . . . don't fly at night unless the stars and moon are shining bright! Landing - The Most Frequent Accident Scenario Take a look at the four accidents depicted in the table below. Do you see anything in common among the four? Yep . . . wind was listed as a probable cause in each. What you do not see in this table is that all four wind related accidents occurred on the same day: September 20, 2007!
No, there was nothing unusual about weather over North America on September 20, 2007. In truth, these same wind-related landing accidents occur just about every day! These are, in fact, the most common of all non-fatal accidents. They also are one of the leading contributors to our excessively high aircraft insurance rates. Then there was another . . . Then, just this past December 1st, the pilot of a Cirrus SR22 lost directional control on landing roll-out at Hendersonville Airport, Hendersonville, North Carolina. Fortunately, there were no injuries but the 1/2 million dollar aircraft was destroyed by a post-crash fire. According to the NTSB preliminary accident report, the pilot stated he was on the landing roll-out when a gust of wind caused the left wing to come up. He said that he applied left aileron and there was no response. The airplane started turning to the right. He lost directional control of the airplane and it came to a stop on the runway.
Why do landing accidents persist? Answer in two words: Defective or incomplete instruction! Our chronic landing accident rate provides solid evidence that new pilots are being turned loose into the national airspace system with little or no crosswind landing training. Many flight schools
actually shut down flight training when winds across the airport are moving at
12 to 14 knots . . . regardless of direction! One reason is because
crosswind proficiency is not likely to be addressed in
Note: Wonder why aircraft insurance rates are soaring? Solution: There is not much we can do to alter the training practices of flight schools and CFIs. We can, however, inoculate ourselves (and our students) against landing upsets caused by winds. The most effective way to do this is to call upon an experienced, wind-savvy instructor and go out and practice cross-wind landings and takeoffs. The more we do, the better and safer we will become! Flight Training . . . wouldn't it be nice if?
I have spent a great deal of time writing in OTA about the weaknesses in today's flight training system and have recently decided to do something about it. To this end, I recently put together what I hope to be an ideal flight training program based at the Buffalo-Lancaster Regional Airport (KBQR). This flight training program fulfills each of the seven elements described above. Located just 6 miles east of the Buffalo/Niagara International Airport (BUF), Bob Miller Flight Training, Inc. offers personalized instruction geared to the unique interests and needs of each of its clients. Come spend several hours, a day, or even a week with us. Learn to fly, or dust off those rusty edges, or earn a new rating. The experience will be worth it! You can learn more about Bob Miller Flight Training, Inc. by clicking HERE. If you or somebody you know would like to train in a program like this, please contact Bob Miller at rjma@rjma.com or call 716-864-8100. Remember, too, that this growing flight school is looking for a few more EXPERIENCED flight instructors who have REAL WORLD flying experience, who are not just building hours for that airline job, and who would like to earn $50 to $60 per hour. If you or somebody you know meets these requirements, contact Bob Miller at rjma@rjma.com or call 716-864-8100.
Weather ahead - will ATC keep you clear of it?? The NTSB has been coming down hard recently on ATC for not alerting pilots of dangerous weather ahead. But is that really their job? When their scopes are full of airplanes and images of precipitation, do they have time to steer us all around the boomers? IFR Magazine published an article on this important safety topic in its January, 2008 issue. You can find it by clicking HERE. Guest Editorial
If you have something pertinent to say about the safety of flight and you would like to have it read by pilots around the world, please send it in. If we publish it, you will receive your very own "official" OTA coffee cup!This month's editorial is written by Max Trescott, author of Max Trescott's G1000 Handbook. Max talks of the importance of doing something serious about reducing our chronic general aviation fatal accident rate. Click HERE to read. Know Your Approach Lighting Systems!
Very often, the first thing we see outside the window at decision height (DH) or at the missed approach point (MAP) is the runway approach lighting system (ALS). Obviously, if we know what that ALS looks like ahead of time, the better prepared we will be to complete the approach and land. The illustration below depicts the most common types of ALSs in use today. We should be familiar with each system and should know, of course, which system is in place at any runway we are using.
A word about daytime use of approach lighting systems My good friend and pilot mentor, Louie Nalbone, DPE from Dunkirk, NY, openly admits that any pilot coming to him for an instrument checkride who fails to activate a pilot controlled lighting system, either night or DAY, may be asked to return at some future date to complete the test. Louie's purpose, of course, is to emphasize the importance of getting those approach lights on whenever descending in IFR conditions, especially during the day when finding the runway can be more difficult than at night!
If you found Over the Airwaves helpful to you personally and/or beneficial to general aviation and would like to support its continued publication, please consider making a donation to the effort. Simply click on the button below to access a secure link through which PayPal, credit card, and personal check donations can be made.
Personal Checks: If you prefer to send a personal check, you can do so by making it payable to "Over the Airwaves" and mail it to: Bob Miller 124 Delaware Street Tonawanda, NY 14150
Your
donations are used exclusively in the preparation,
advancement, and promotion of
Over the
Airwaves to
and for pilots all over the globe. AOPA - ASF Accident Data - Beware of the "Spin!" The 2007 AOPA Air Safety Foundation Nall Report was released this past week. Not surprisingly, it boasted big improvements in our GA safety record over the past 10 years. Below is a direct quote from the introductory section of this publication:
All in all, it looks like we've made great improvements in the flight safety department, right? Look again! The chart below is reprinted from the same ASF report. Instead of looking back 10 years to 1997 for trend information, look back just 8 years to 1999. Using AOPA's own data, you will see that our total accident rate has increased, not decreased as the Nall Report boldly states!
Now look at the fatal accident rate. Again, using 1999 as the base year, our fatal accident rate remains as flat as the Kansas prairie! Thus, we can see how a little creative "cherry picking" of the data enables AOPA's Air Safety Foundation to craft a misleading argument that GA's safety record continues to improve. Misleading messages are dangerous While putting a good face on the accident data may be good public relations and it may help to convince us dues paying members that AOPA is doing a great job to improve safety, it could be sending a falsely encouraging message to us GA pilots. If we really believe that we're improving, will we continue doing what we're doing? Common sense confirms that! Sadly, what we are doing is NOT producing measurable reductions in our fatal accident rate. If we all take a very hard look at the actual accident data, maybe some of the money spent on AOPA's 200-plus safety seminars and 17,000 online courses each year could be better spent finding NEW ways to improve flight safety rather than repackaging the same old safety messages in new media formats.
In summary, we all know and love AOPA. They do serve us well in most areas. However, AOPA's Air Safety Foundation, which was presumably formed to promote flight safety, should work a bit harder in exploring the root cause of our piloting blunders. For example, the ASF might take a critical look at EACH of our daily fatal accidents and analyze the pilot factors that may have contributed to that accident. The results of each of these analyses could be published much the same way as the NTSB publishes its probable cause findings. Unlike the NTSB's accident reports, that focus primarily on aircraft mechanical issues, the ASF reports could delve more deeply into the accident pilot's primary, advanced, and recurrent training, and his currency history. Since pilot factors are the cause of over 80% of all fatal accidents, it seems only natural that we attempt to learn as much about pilot factors that may have contributed to the accident as we do about the accident airplane's mechanical factors. In summary, rather than serving as a flag waver for general aviation, the ASF would serve us all better by putting on a less positive "spin" on our unchanging fatal accident rate and giving us a more objective analysis of the accident data. Yes, of course, our membership organizations are in place to promote general aviation to our legislators, regulators, and the public. In so doing, it is relatively easy to cherry pick the accident numbers that present the most positive safety picture. Our problem as pilots, however, is that we not start believing our own press clippings. We must discern the fine line difference between effective public relations and reality. Nostalgia . . . Many of us pilots grew up in the Sixties. We remember 30 cents per gallon gasoline and the way things were back then. Take a look at this video! Click HERE. Instrument Scan and Cross-Check in Glass Cockpit Aircraft Anyone who has piloted a glass cockpit-equipped aircraft can attest to the benefits of having all critical flight data displayed in one central location. They can also attest to the confusion that easily results from having too much data. In times of stress, this abundance of data can easily overwhelm the non-proficient instrument pilot.
Looking at the Garmin 1000 Primary Flight Display (PFD) above, can you pick out the indicated altitude, airspeed, heading, and flight attitude in less than a second or two? You should be able to do so with ease. Developing an effective instrument scan with the G1000 or Avidyne equipped airplane takes just a few minutes to develop, but like conventional round gauges, it should be practiced often. Find your favorite safety pilot or CFII and climb into the clag. Secure a block altitude IFR clearance and practice maneuvering on the gauges. Do some steep turns, unusual attitude recoveries, and partial panel work using only the back-up instruments. In time, it will become second nature! With all due respect to PCATDs and view limiting devices to
simulate IFR conditions, the ONLY way we will ever become comfortable on the
gauges is from lots of actual IFR flying. What they don't teach primary flight students - but should!
Okay, so new pilots should not be flying in the weather depicted in this video . . . but, because of the vagaries of predicted weather, they sometimes do . . . and with nasty consequences! Click HERE. Thanks to C.B. Goldacker, Col, USAF (Ret), Davenport, FL for sharing this video with us! Descending by the Numbers Given the technology aboard many of today's GA aircraft, there is little excuse for not "nailing" every non-precision instrument approach. All we need to know is the vertical descent angle (VDA) as published on the profile view of the instrument approach chart and our ground speed, either estimated or as displayed on the panel. A quick reference to a sample instrument approach plate profile view below depicts a 2.97 degree VDA.
Another quick reference to the Rate of Descent Table printed at the back of NACO instrument approach plates enable us to match the VDA with our ground speed. Once done, we know the proper descent rate we need to achieve to produce a stabilized approach to the runway.
A word about stabilized versus "dive and drive" descents on non-precision approaches . . .
The other school suggests a "dive and drive" approach where we quickly descend to the next lower altitude fix that is depicted on the approach plate. The advantage of the "dive and drive" method is that it gets us down below freezing clouds in less time than the "stabilized" method. Rather than recommending one school of thought over the other, the best method depends upon weather conditions. The "stabilized" approach is better when ice is not a factor. The "dive and drive" method can get us down through ice conditions more quickly, presuming we find above freezing or clear air below. Aero-News.Net Features OTA in Podcasts
"Emergency GPS Descents is the latest in a series of podcasts I have been doing with Aero-News.Net's Paul Plack. You can hear, or download for later listening, these 15 minute interviews and any of the previously conducted podcasts by clicking on the titles below:
By the way, Aero-News.Net is a FREE daily online publication that is packed with aviation related news. It is the first thing I read every morning. You can log on to Aero-News.Net and subscribe for your free subscription by clicking HERE. Join the New Age of General Aviation! Let's face it, GA has gone glass! In fact, it's difficult to find any new aircraft, from airliners, to biz jets, and all the way down to light sport, coming out of the factories today with conventional round gauges. It's all glass! Future professional pilots should take note of this important fact. The sooner you can become comfortable with this new technology, the better prepared you will be to take command of 21st century aircraft.
It's worth the time to explore your local flight training community to find glass cockpit-equipped aircraft to train in. Here in Western New York, we're fortunate to have two such sources. One is Dunkirk Aviation Sales and Service (KDKK) in Dunkirk, NY and the other is at at the Lancaster, NY Airport (KBQR). Helpful Sponsors
We GA pilots tend to
be control freaks. We like the ability to come and
go as we please. Other than taking clearances from ATC,
we do not like being told
where, when, and how
to go. That's why we choose to fly our own
airplanes rather than taking the airlines.
But having control comes with responsibility. This responsibility includes, of course, designing a safe, fool-proof plan every time we launch. It requires that we make proper go/no go decisions. It says that we develop the routing, evaluate the weather, and do the fuel planning.
Our "backdoors" include a suitable off-airport landing site should we lose power on takeoff. They also include having quickly accessible warmer air or VFR should we encounter airframe icing. It's carrying floatation or survival gear when flying over open water or hostile terrain. Heck, it could be as simple as carrying a functioning flashlight when flying at night. Curiously, such contingency planning can be fun. It's the kind of thing we do on the drive to the airport. Asking ourselves a lot of "what if" questions typically begins the process. "What if" the battery is dead? "What if" the ceiling and visibility lowers? "What if" my passenger tosses his cookies in the climb? There are endless "what if" type questions we should be asking ourselves prior to and during every flight. Make a game out of it. How many such questions can we come up with? Then ask ourself, is there any aspect of my planned flight where I do not have an "out?" Night takeoffs over cold water is one that I dread. There are others, of course. The key to a long life as a pilot is to have an "out" for every possible contingency!
Podcasts of Over the Airwaves now available!!Responding to popular demand, the December, 2007 OTA issue is now available in a podcast audio format. Simply click on the link below to listen online or to download to your favorite digital device for later listening! Note: This is a 9mb file and may require several minutes with a high speed connection to download. Podcast OTA Vol 4, No 22 December, 2007
|